Skip to content
Playerly

Compare comparable groups

There is no published Playerly benchmark dataset yet. Start with the rules that make comparisons useful.

Every rate starts with a player group

Define who is counted, the observation period, and which event means a return. The same formula can then describe the same metric.

Returning playersOriginal cohort× 100Return rate, %

Before comparing, check

  • Same game
  • Same GEO
  • Same acquisition period
  • Complete return window

Why there is no universal W1 target

Returns depend on the game, country, source, and timing. An industry average can mislead without its sample composition and metric definition.

Minimum comparison context

Comparable conditions

Game, GEO, source, and cohort age.

Size and coverage

Original group size, matched-event coverage, and incomplete periods.

Method

Formula, calendar, exclusions, and extraction date.

Start with your own cohorts

Compare two sources within one game and country. Repeat in another period before treating the result as stable. The source-comparison guide helps you prepare this analysis.

Explore your goals with Playerly

Explore the right scenario for your games or traffic sources: player analytics, attribution, and collaboration between providers and affiliates.

Book a demo

Book a demo

Explore Playerly through your use case. We’ll message you on Telegram to clarify your goals and agree on a time.

Username of 5+ characters, a t.me link, or a phone number

Data Protection Policy

Protected by reCAPTCHA. Google’s Privacy Policy and Terms of Service.