Collection
Game integrations, identifiers, and delivery monitoring.
Playerly and in-house BI
Compare event availability, source matching, and measurement maintenance, rather than charts alone.
Compare the answers your team needs
Start with available data and access boundaries. Then establish which part of the question your current stack answers.
| Question | Required data | What to agree |
|---|---|---|
| Where did the player come from? | Source and identifier | Matching rule |
| What happened in the game? | Game-event stream | Event types and completeness |
| Who returned? | Identifier and time | Cohort and observation window |
| Who sees the result? | Agreed metric set | Permissions and access scope |
What in-house BI offers
Control of the data model, custom dimensions, and joins with internal sources. This is a strong option when the team already receives the required events and can maintain their quality.
What costs to compare
Methodology
Sessions, cohorts, duplicates, and reconciliation with other sources.
Maintenance
Schema changes, permissions, retention, and incident ownership.
The answer depends on your stack
Record requirements, available sources, and total cost of ownership. Include development, quality control, and integration maintenance. Agree export formats and BI connectivity with the technical team.
Explore your goals with Playerly
Explore the right scenario for your games or traffic sources: player analytics, attribution, and collaboration between providers and affiliates.
Book a demo